Advanced Work Packaging Challenges in Construction Industry
Amazingly intricate construction projects of today need a wide range of operations that need to be coordinated like a vast symphony for success. Advanced Work Packaging (AWP) is a practice in the construction industry that provides a focused approach for capital projects to achieve better collaboration through controlled planning. The AWP approach involves construction professionals in the planning process from the start, allowing for the early production of specific work packages that will ultimately drive field activities.
Advanced work packaging software is deployed to improve project efficiency and predictability by integrating planning and execution activities throughout the project lifecycle. Though AWP is a proven construction best practice to improve the performance of construction projects, there are certain challenges and drawbacks that need to be overcome during the project.
Although the AWP approach has been well
described, traditional AWP technology applications have proven to be difficult
to implement and not scalable to all projects. While there are several solutions
that can assist large-scale projects, the majority of initiatives are small to
medium-sized and need a different strategy. AWP is simple and logical, but
there are a few obstacles to overcome before perfectly deploying the AWP
framework.
Not economical to use for small- to
medium-sized projects
Although the majority of construction
projects are small to mid-sized, the majority of advanced work packaging
software is designed to aid large-cap projects. However, there are solutions
available, which is good news.
It takes months to deploy
Even when they are implemented, these
applications frequently take months to deploy. You require solutions that are
effective when you need them most. Deploying AWP shouldn't involve an expensive
and time-consuming waiting period.
High administrative cost
For the management of their operations,
many conventional applications need a dedicated server architecture. The
administrative costs and overhead could significantly increase the work
required for implementation.
High-latency, paper-based workflows
After completion, AWP projects may still
lead to high-latency, paper-based workflows. This just serves to increase
users' dissatisfaction as they attempt to become accustomed to new technology
but continue to run into many of the same problems.
Proprietary standards
Many of the data that legacy systems save
and use are unique to that system and difficult to use elsewhere. This forces a
siloed strategy and causes effort to be duplicated in other systems.
System-dependent design
Projects may use a variety of design
software solutions but older programs that expect to receive all of the data in
the formats unique to that platform find it difficult to combine all of this
data.
These are some challenges that users face
while deploying advanced work packaging software for a capital project. So, how
can companies determine the best way to utilize AWP applications in a scalable,
efficient way? Typically, uniform solutions fall short of meeting diverse
needs. Instead, businesses must approach AWP workflows in a fundamentally
unique, personalized way to achieve their project goals.

Comments
Post a Comment